Majorityrights Central > Category: Activism

The following letter was addressed to the head of MediaNews, the corporation that owns the San Jose Mercury News, the monopoly paper for the 10th largest city in the USA.

Bo

Dear Mr. Singleton,

We emailed preliminary objections to you on 9/27/06 about the use of an undocumented and unsubstantiated “bloody bits” anecdote passed off as true in a Richard Cohen column that veered sharply from being opinion into being an assertion of fact, and printed in the San Jose Mercury News on 9/26/06. We have now had an opportunity to read all the reviews, related literature, and the entire 512-page book that contains the single-sourced bloody bits anecdote, The Lost, published in AD 2006.

READ MORE...

I don’t know whether this idea will fly but ...

I am interested in building up a list of corrective word and phrase definitions, each of which encapsulates our worldview and might have some utility in combatting the pervasiveness of left-speak.  For example:-

amnesty  a public admission by the US federal government that its immigration laws do not work, and a private admission that they are not meant to
anarcho-capitalism  religion of the capitalist self, attractive to 40 year-old businessmen trying to be hip
anti-discrimination law  destruction of European peoples’ freedoms of association
anti-racism  fanatical hatred of normal Europeans
anti-semite  any European who resists behaviour by Ashkenazic Jews damaging to his people
Ashkenazic Jews  non-semitic tribe of Central Asian origin who comprise 90% of Jewry
assimilation  once proof that any European could find his or her own place in America; assimilationism  the ideology that assimilation is just as possible for non-Europeans
Auschwitz  one-time labour camp, now a temple of perpetual European damnation
Boer genocide  wave of farm murders since the ANC came to power in SA
Canadian anglophones  francophiles
Canadian francophones  anglophobes
civil rights  government-decreed access for blacks to white society, with no corresponding demand for improvements to black behaviour; African-American civil rights movement Anti-white, pro-black agitation of the 50’s and 60’s organised by Jewish political activists until the Black Power Movement could take over
color-blind  blind
conservatism  the political expression of love of self, love of kind, love of country; Conservative Party  right-liberal political group in Britain; social conservatism  understanding of and profound respect for sociobiologically-derived mores and traditions
cognitive dissonance  an anxiety condition common among liberals who encounter, for example, race-realism
cognitive eltism  the idea that Europeans should be displaced and/or replaced by the world’s smartest non-whites because the world’s dummies are a downright disaster
conspiracy theory  smear term for almost any mention of the elephant in the living room
correlation vs. causation  (also “correlation is not causation”) ostrich tactic commonly employed by race-deniers when confronted by Occam’s razor or plain common sense
culture war  the use of homosexual and ethnic minority interests to undo, subvert or otherwise destroy personal and societal norms
democracy  an oligarchy in which the ordinary people think they can elect their leaders
distributism  economic system aiming at the diffusion of property among the populace
diversity  political buzzword for the decivilisation of European societies, often applied to specific localities (opp of “hideously white”)
economism  the belief that only economic and financial ends are really important
egalitarianism  the pretence that poofs, dykes and low-IQ folks are equal to or the same as normal Europeans
equal rights  equal outcomes ... and jam for equality professionals; a mandate for authoritarianism and theft by taxation
european  of Europe or the peoples of Europe
far right  smear term frequently applied to any normal European
fascism  political philosophy peculiar to Italy; fascist  smear term frequently applied to any normal European
freedom  not choice, not an unfettered will, not anything open to the moderation of politics.  Something more.
gay rights  sad wrongs done to our freedoms of speech and association; euphemism for Homosexualist Marxism; the buggering of normalcy
genetic determinism  Orwellian attempt to smear hereditarians with fanaticism by those who are themselves fanatical in their environmental determinism
hate  the idea of or desire for self-determination among European peoples; hate crime legal confirmation of the primacy of minority feelings; hate speech language tending to the survival of European peoples; hate speech law  legalistic attempt to eliminate from public discourse all language tending to the survival of European peoples
holocaust gratuitous Jewish-racial hagiography on an industrial scale
homosexual  (incl. lesbian) human tragedy requiring of the sufferer personal self-restraint in return for public tolerance
illiberal  non-liberal; comment, itself “illiberal”, upon the opinions of a normal person
immigrant  alien aggressing against European economic, land and genetic resources
integration  slow European genocide, and the only genuine alternative to multiculturalism (happily, that’s failed multiculturalism, of course) or repatriation
interculturalism  pathetic attempt to replace failed multiculturalism with chapati-baking lessons for the (remaining) white housewives of Leicester
Iraq  mental condition affecting the Bush dynasty
la-la land  that place under the soil where ostriches and liberals stick their heads
liberal  captive of liberalism; liberalism  the politics of decivilising the West
libertarian  childish right-liberal freedom junkie with an IQ of 120; libertarianism  (second-wave) purest form of liberalism, tending to the atomisation of society into competing sovereign wills and disqualifying the ethnic interest-based presumptions on which racial survival depends
limousine liberal  members of the political class who gush regularly for the poor they hope never to meet
melting pot genocide of the dark ally and the bed pillow
Mark Stein widely-published Canadian journalist and dissembling shill for the “war on terror”
Marxism  the still-beating heart of the left, even after 100,000,000 deaths by collectivism and state terror, and the collapse of all social and economic credibility
Mexico  a country shortly to be found south of MT and west of LA
multiculturalism  failed attempt by the liberal establishment to force unassimilable aliens on Europeans through the recognition of only cultural differences
nation  a people and a land - Blut und Boden, the one inseparable from the other; nationalist  person who comprehends the inseparability of blood and soil
nazi (from Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei; NSDAP) smear term frequently applied to normal Europeans; nazi war crimes  war crimes by nazis
neoconservatives  Jewish ex-trotskyites and fellow travellers who stole the GOP from European-Americans, captured the US Presidency, opened the borders as wide as possible and declared war on Israel’s enemies.
one-man-one-vote  (abbr. OMOV) a method of restraining indigenous and socially conservative interests at the ballot box
paternalism  feminist paranoia about the benign father figure
patriot  person who does not necessarily comprehend the inseparability of blood and soil, but loves the soil anyway
political correctness  self-censorship in imitatio Marxo for the comfort and good of blacks, queers, liberal academics, etc
pornography  extreme expression of secular Jewish individualism
precision bombing  whoops!
psyops  cynical manipulation of public feeling and opinion by an hidden enemy within
racialist  normal person who puts the interests of his or her people first; racial majority  European people who, by their mere existence, obstruct progress towards the goals of liberalism; racial minority  client group of any liberal, assumed to be inherently noble and in need of protection from white racism and privilege; racial prejudice  believing non-whites are racially inferior, since believing them equal is apparently not a prejudgement; racial supremacism scare story told by race-deniers to avoid the normality of racialism; perfectly logical result of Nature’s diversity racist  term of abuse for a normal European person; a conservative winning an argument with a liberal (Thomas Sowell)
repatriation  redemption from the folly and self-destructiveness of post-war immigration policy in the West
sixties  decade of moral self-indulgence, of revolt against the father, of flight into fantasy, of conservative collapse
social engineering  proof that Man is not perfectible
social scientist  professional bigot who researches us solely to reinforce his or her anti-white, anti-male or heterophobic prejudices
state  the institutions of power through which the liberal-left has marched
Steve Sailer  American journalist with extremely sound race-realist credentials but a fatal incapacity or unwillingness to follow the political logic
terrorism  blind hatred in pursuit of political self-justification
taboo-breaking  wet dream of all liberals, providing the alleged taboos are the natural foundations of society ... but shock and horror if the taboos are their own
two-party system  one-party system
unfettered will  being anyone and doing anything your silly head wishes; the execrable understanding of human nature which is the holy of liberal holies, for spaced-out jumpers everywhere: “I can fly, baby ...”
war on terror  popular belief among certain European peoples that Apache attack helicopters in Lashkargah will save them from what Moslems do in bed in Brussels and Bradford
white flight  Orwellian term blaming whites for their own ethnic cleansing
white privilege the allegedly academic theory that the poor outcomes of certain minorities are caused not by their own failings but by the skin colour of Europeans
white separatism  precondition for racial survival in a multiracial state, akin to repatriation in the ancient nations of Europe
white supremacism,  see “racial supremacism”

There are, I suppose, hundreds of words that could be so defined.  Bearing in mind that the object of the definition is to be accurate, concise (or, if not, funny), and fully “awake” you are cordially invited to improve on and add to the little list I have crashed out above.  If sufficient defs eventually build up - and we are not in a hurry - we can post them as a running feature linked from our front-page.  (I should just add that I will be sole editor and adjudicator of suitability, should anyone care to contribute).

This essay is my response to VDARE’s publication of a piece by Steve Sailer on Aug. 27, 2006.  VDARE declined to publish this response.

Steve Sailer’s essay, purportedly about an editorial project by the late Samuel Francis, was shallow and misleading. Sailer even saw fit to compare one of the writings to a book about penguins in a heavy-handed way to show witty contempt.

The Red Herring: Who Is White?

After briefly reviewing the Francis editorial project, Sailer abruptly raises the divisive question, “Who Is White?” which torments no one who has a decent sense of self-respect, and as a way to muddy up the overall issue.

And that question in this context on an immigration reform web site should provide the definitive anecdote illustrating the meaning of “red herring” in all dictionaries.  Addressing it as a weighty and oh-so-difficult matter, Sailer pretends to ponder whether Muslims, Iranians, Arabs, Chechens, Turks, Albanians, Greeks, Sicilians, and Jews are white.

Who Is White Answered

But the answer to “Who is white?” is simplicity itself.

White people are those young and old people who are attacked for being white on college campuses, on television news and entertainment programs, in the print media, and on sidewalks and playgrounds. White people have their whiteness defined for them by denunciation.

On the West Coast, media typically list major demographic groups with these labels: “African-American, Asian-American, and white.”  White people are those people given the label that has two negative characteristics: no capital letter and no American status. (Unless the label is “non-Hispanic white” which has three negative characteristics.)

White people are the ones never described as diverse or vibrant or culturally enriching.

White people are told that they have all the power, but who find that they do not have the power to choose their neighbors, their employees, and their children’s schools, or to end the campaign of defamation that flows over their children every day via the dominant media culture and the corporate entertainment culture.

Getting Down And Wrestling

Sailer’s next topic is his claim that “white Americans these days really don’t like getting down and wrestling with the Al Sharptons [sic] of the world for racial spoils.”  But he cites no evidence for this over-wrought claim and, in fact, Al Sharpton is probably the most wrestled with African-American ever. Consider the smackdown administered to him by an Italian-American attorney over the false claims of a kidnapping some years ago.  Sailer typically picked the worst example he could have so far as “getting down and wrestling” is concerned.

Our Friendly-Enemies

Unfortunately, Sailer’s ideological wanderings have yet to come home to a sensible place, and those of us who are conscious of the campaign of defamation against young European Americans need to speak out when needed against our friendly-enemies like Steve Sailer, Mark Steyn, Lawrence Auster, Henry Makow, Israel Shamir, and Eric Margolis.  Their advice, like their friendship, is tainted with strawmen, red herrings, slurs, hate caricatures, misleading historical bits, a supremacist claim to have the right to tell us what our name is and how we should think, unworthy vocabulary tricks, and/or the selection of their enemies for European Americans to hate and fear, too.

Immigration Reform

If friendly-enemies can help in the fight for responsible immigration, let’s welcome them to that fight.  However, the only line in Sailer’s essay that touched on immigration reform was, “Today, Karl Rove swearing allegiance in person to the immigration goals of the National Council of La Raza is considered somewhere between unobjectionable and admirable.”

That’s not enough to justify Sailer’s long-winded and mendacious attempt on an immigration reform web-site to describe and define whites, much less to prescribe how European Americans should think and feel about themselves.

Bo Sears
ResistingDefamation.org

This opinion piece by Zef Chavets - titled “Anti-Semitic comments aren’t kosher, Mr. Gibson” - first appeared in the Los Angeles Times.  But yesterday it was syndicated by our good friends at the San Jose Mercury News.  It contained the word, “goyish”, which places it well within range of the RD artillery …

TO: George Riggs, Publisher, San Jose Mercury News (MediaNews Group)

TO: Stephen E. Wright, Editorial Page Editor, San Jose Mercury News (MediaNews Group)

ON: August 4, 2006

RE: Editorial Page Essay (Page 14A) by Zev Chafets (Written for Los Angeles Times)

We strongly protest your endorsement of a derivative of “goy” in the Chafets essay today. The words “goy,” “goyish,” and “goyim” represent such a packet of hatred that we feel it necessary to object loudly and clearly to Chafets’ effort to name us with this ugly and divisive label.

Chafets used the ugly “goyish” term in this sentence:

“But after the film [“The Passion”] grossed more than $600 million, these execs raised Gibson on their shoulders and began optioning every goyish property from Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians to the Anglican Book of Common Prayer.” More than a little anti-Christian bigotry lurks in that sentence, but our concern is with “goyish.”

[And what an odd slur to publish on the Friday after the Wednesday when the San Jose Mercury News officially passed to the MediaNews of Denver. Are we going to have a new flood of bigotry and divisiveness under MediaNews?]

Chafets’ claim to name the rest of us in the world is obviously based on a claim to supremacy—after all, what is the claim to have the right to name the other than a claim based on supremacy? Members of all races and religions appear to have sought to impose their name for the other on the other, but it is astounding to see the San Jose Mercury News, on its second day under new ownership, privilege Chafets’ dream of lording it over others by naming them as he chooses.

It shouldn’t be news to the publisher and editorial page editor of the San Jose Mercury News that this kind of labeling is the ultimate in divisive talk—Chafets just divides the world into two chunks of humanity, and names the one he is not a member of!

And it shouldn’t be news to the publisher and editorial page editor of the San Jose Mercury News that it is the members of any group under discussion that have the unlimited right and privilege to name themselves. What part of “Our Names, Ourselves” don’t you understand?

The most remarkable thing about the evil triplets (goy, goyish, goyim) is that the use of these terms serves to suppress the diversity of every other group in the world except for the group with which Chafets identifies. This is a kind of ultimate arrogance that surprised us to see the San Jose Mercury News endorse by publishing Chafets’ piece.

While “goyish” is divisive, supremacy-driven, and anti-diversity, we do not claim it is offensive. We are not concerned about our feelings in this matter, only that the mean-spiritedness of Chafets (and his publishers) should be laid bare.

The Ninth Circuit spoke out on the “goy” word in Baballah v. Ashcroft, decided 7/11/03.

Here is part of what the court said in its decision about Baballah’s treatment in Israel, before granting him asylum in the USA.

Referring to treatment by employers, “Although Baballah had studied to be an accountant, bank official refused to hire him when they discovered his background. These officials told him that he would ‘follow in [his] father’s footsteps’ and called him a ‘goy’...and [he was] turned away.”

The San Francisco Chronicle published an excellent article (7/12/03) on this decision which also discusses “goy.”

Kindly cease and desist the pattern and practice of endorsing divisive, supremacy-driven, and anti-diversity labels for us on your editorial page and throughout your paper. Kindly update your “style book” to enforce the cultural and social rule that only members of groups get to name their own groups. Remember, “Our Names, Ourselves.”

Bo Sears
ResistingDefamation.org

Steve Sailer’s latest article in The American Conservative was, as usual, replete with exactly the kind of language we want to see eliminated from public discourse.  So we decided to write to the Great Man and let him know none too gently where he is falling down on the job ...

Steve Sailer,

The reason we think you are a phony in almost everything you write is because of sentences like this one:-

Because the median voter is in his late forties, non-Hispanic whites cast 79 percent of the votes in 2004, according to the Census Bureau, even though they comprise only 68 percent of the total population and just 57 percent of those under age five.

You have to know that calling us “non-Hispanic whites” is a symptom of hostility to the majority of USA voters.  So why are you using a hateful vocabulary that smothers our diversity and reeks of contempt to describe us in the context of an article that seems to argue that Democrats should give some respect to us?  You are really part of that great hate-filled attack on Americans of European origins.  Most people don’t get it, but we see it clearly in your vocabulary and in your arguments.

And we see you like the hate term “gentile” as used in this sentence:-

In the past, it would have been unthinkable for a far Left organization to get a higher proportion of gentile than Jewish support, but the times they are a-changin’.

I don’t know who you think you are fooling, but “gentile” is a name imposed on us.  Many of us reject it out of hand as contemptuous and certainly as part of an effort to smother our diversity in public discourse.  Where do you get the right to slap us with “gentile”?

We’ll leave aside your cheap reliance on the bizarre red-blue state fantasy, but we reject your use of that left-wing, media caricature as unworthy of any thinking person.

Shame on you.

Stanley Womack
ResistingDefamation.org

There seems to be serious resistance to using a combative approach to name-calling against our young children along the lines of Abe Foxman and his crew at ADL.  But ADL, ACLU, PAW, and SPLC specialize on a daily basis in a revolting brand of hate speech that has to have a serious negative impact on us and, more to the point, on our young children.

We began Resisting Defamation in 1990, and took its Syllabus on-line a few years later, but intelligent European Americans have not embraced the cause.  We’re not pleading that our version is the only possible version, but where else on the Internet is there a site that attacks back against editors, columnists, and writers who engage in the most repellent smear attacks on us and our children?  We need ten, one hundred, one thousand web-sites bashing back.

I mention intelligent European Americans because IQ tests are more-or-less normed to our continent-of-origin, so there is a possibility that fully one-half of us literally do not understand the need to speak up.  And probably a huge share of those with above average intelligence find it embarrassing, shameful, too costly, or beneath them to speak up.  Why should this be so?

In our local experience, we have materially stung white-bashers, changed behavior, and gotten people who smear us fired from jobs. Just like ADL.  But where are the writers and thinkers who will resist defamation across the North American, Australian, and European continents?

And with our “theory of slurs,” there is no need to whine, discuss your feelings, or claim hurt. Our approach looks at labels as to whether (1) they are contemptuous, (2) they are based on a supremacist claim, or (3) they act to smother our Euro-diversities, histories, heritages, and cultures.  Still, the larger minds among our kin find the concept of speaking out to be beneath them.

It seems that common sense, a ready-made vocabulary, and proven techniques aren’t persuasive to our natural leaders, so I will appeal to authority to get some action.

I imagine we are all aware of the remarkable work of Wilmot Robertson, and the authority and prestige carried by his name and writings.  So let’s take a look at what he said about this phenomenon of silence toward hate speech.

In his book, “The Dispossessed Majority,” first published in 1981, twenty-five years ago, and in his Chapter Ten, “The Decline of the Majority,” he says:

“There are aggressively censorious minority organizations, principal among them the B’nai B’rith’s Anti-Defamation League, which monitor the printed and the spoken word for the most subtle anti-minority allusions. Should any be found, the owner or editor of the offending media and, if necessary, the writer, advertisers and stockholders are so advised and admonished… The Majority, to its great loss, has no similar watchdog organizations.”

Think of that and then think of all the ink spilled, all the electronics hurled through the ether, and all the writing about high-minded theories, but only one anti-defamation Internet-based group is in existence for all of Euro-diversity.  Why the reluctance to tangle with the dominant media culture and the corporate entertainment culture to protect our children?  I’d really like to hear from posters as to why they decline to take Wilmot Robertson’s advice to form “watchdog organizations” especially to secure our Majority Rights.

Stanley Womack

ResistingDefamation.org

I have been asked to provide the current prison contact address for Kevin Hughes.  Readers will know that he is the BNP member handed down a two and a half year custodial sentence for an argument in the street with an Iraqi asylum seeker.  No one was hurt.  But the judge at Worcester Crown Court saw his anti-racist duty clearly.

Kevin is a man of good character, a family man, a charitable worker and, of course, a loyal Englishman.  He is, it seems, finding that the long prison day goes by extremely slowly, and yet he has been denied newspapers and books by the authorities.

He is allowed to receive mail.  I am sure that not just fellow BNP members have written to him offering their support, but good people all around the world who know a judicial wrong when they see one.  Any MR reader who wishes to remind Kevin that he has not been forgotten may do so by writing here:-

Kevin Hughes
XB4290
HMP Featherstone
New Road
Featherstone
Wolverhampton
WV10 7PU

For correspondents within the UK a stamped-addressed envelope would be much appreciated, so he can reply.

Kevin now has his appeal papers drawn up.  There is good hope that his clearly inappropriate sentence will be reduced.  But his criminal record will, sadly, never be expunged.

Rebuking newspaper editors for various slurs is a valuable effort because it does make them confront their bias. Here is our response to the Publisher and the Editorial Page Editor of the San Jose Mercury News when they validated an op-ed piece labeling us with the Spanish-language term “Anglo.” This is offered to Majority Rights posters as a possible sample for such rebukes.

Note there is no crying game, no claim of hurt feelings. No passive-aggressive stuff here. No begging, no weeping. But it will have an impact over time because the argument will always appear on the Internet when the editors’ names are searched.

And rebuking the media masters about their hate speech is better than chattering about it among ourselves.

Stan

READ MORE...